Tech enthusiast and journalist with a passion for exploring the latest innovations and sharing practical advice for everyday users.
A pair of award-winning Kiwi writers have had their works excluded from consideration for the country's esteemed literary prize because of the utilization of AI in designing their book covers.
Stephanie Johnson's short story compilation "Obligate Carnivore" and the writer's short novel collection "Angel Train" were submitted for the 2026 Ockham book awards and its $65,000 New Zealand dollar novel award in the tenth month, but were disqualified the following thirty days because of new rules concerning AI usage.
The publisher of the two books, Quentin Wilson, stated that the awards organizers updated the criteria in August, by which point the covers for every submitted title would have already been finalized.
“Consequently, it was much too late for publishers to incorporate this new rule into their design plans,” the publisher said.
The author expressed understanding for the award organizers, stating she shares serious worries about artificial intelligence in artistic fields, but was let down by the ruling.
“I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t sad about it,” she commented. “This marks my 22nd publication and my fourth short story anthology. These tales … were composed over roughly two decades, making this a particularly significant work for me.”
She added that writers usually have minimal input in cover design and was unaware AI had been used for her book cover, which features a cat with human dentition.
“I believed it was an actual cat photo with superimposed teeth, but that was not the case,” Johnson said, noting that unlike more tech-savvy generations, she struggles to identify AI-generated images.
The writer feared that the public might think she used AI to write her book, which she categorically denied.
“Rather than discussing my book's themes and inspirations, we're focused on this AI issue, which I despise.”
In a statement, Elizabeth Smither expressed that the artists devoted considerable time crafting her book's art, which includes a locomotive and an angel partially hidden by smoke, influenced by painter the artist's figures.
“It is them I am most concerned about: that their meticulous work … is being disrespected,” Smither remarked.
The trust chair, chair of the book awards trust that administers the prizes, said the organization maintains a “firm stance on the application of AI in publications.”
“The trust does not take lightly a decision that prevents the latest works of two of New Zealand’s most esteemed writers from being considered for the 2026 award,” Legat said.
“Nevertheless, the rules apply equally to every participant, no matter their standing, and must be enforced uniformly.”
The decision to revise the artificial intelligence criteria was motivated by a desire to support the creative and intellectual property rights of the country's authors and artists, she explained.
“As AI evolves, there may well be a need for the trust to revisit and develop the criteria further.”
Wilson pointed out that publishers and writers regularly use software like Grammarly and Photoshop, which incorporate artificial intelligence, and this situation underscored the urgent requirement for well-defined guidelines.
“As an industry, we must work together to ensure that this situation does not happen again.”
Both Smither and Johnson have previously been jurors for categories of the prizes, and both emphasized that covers get minimal attention during evaluation.
“The contents and the close reading were everything,” the author concluded.
The use of AI in artistic fields has faced growing examination as the tech advances, with some organizations developing methods to counter its impact.
Tech enthusiast and journalist with a passion for exploring the latest innovations and sharing practical advice for everyday users.